Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 9(56), p. 1703-1716, 2023

DOI: 10.1002/eat.23997

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Risk factors for anorexia nervosa: A population‐based investigation of sex differences in polygenic risk and early life exposures

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo examine sex differences in risk factors for anorexia nervosa (AN).MethodThis population‐based study involved 44,743 individuals (6,239 AN cases including 5,818 females and 421 males, and 38,504 controls including 18,818 females and 19,686 males) born in Denmark between May 1981 and December 2009. Follow‐up began on the individual's sixth birthday and ended at AN diagnosis, emigration, death, or December 31, 2016, whichever occurred first. Exposures included socioeconomic status (SES), pregnancy, birth, and early childhood factors based on data from Danish registers, and psychiatric and metabolic polygenic risk scores (PRS) based on genetic data. Hazard ratios were estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazards models stratified by sex (assigned at birth), with AN diagnosis as the outcome.ResultsThe effects of early life exposures and PRS on AN risk were comparable between females and males. Although we observed some differences in the magnitude and direction of effects, there were no significant interactions between sex and SES, pregnancy, birth, or early childhood exposures. The effects of most PRS on AN risk were highly similar between the sexes. We observed significant sex‐specific effects of parental psychiatric history and body mass index PRS, though these effects did not survive corrections for multiple comparisons.ConclusionsRisk factors for AN are comparable between females and males. Collaboration across countries with large registers is needed to further investigate sex‐specific effects of genetic, biological, and environmental exposures on AN risk, including exposures in later childhood and adolescence as well as the additive effects of exposures.Public significanceSex differences in the prevalence and clinical presentation of AN warrant examination of sex‐specific risk factors. This population‐based study indicates that the effects of polygenic risk and early life exposures on AN risk are comparable between females and males. Collaboration between countries with large registers is needed to further investigate sex‐specific AN risk factors and improve early identification of AN.