Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Frontiers Media, Frontiers in Marine Science, (9), 2022

DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.912856

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Spatial and temporal variability of phytoplankton photophysiology in the Atlantic Southern Ocean

Journal article published in 2022 by Asmita Singh, Sandy J. Thomalla, Susanne Fietz ORCID, Thomas J. Ryan-Keogh
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Active chlorophyll-a fluorescence was measured during five summer research cruises (2008 – 2016), spanning the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean. This unique data set provides information for assessing zonal, inter-annual and intra-seasonal variability (early versus late summer) of photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm). The zonal variability of Fv/Fm showed a typical latitudinal decline from a maximum in the Polar Frontal Zone (PFZ) (0.24±0.03) to a minimum in the Southern Antarctic Circumpolar Current Zone (SACCZ) (0.18±0.07). The inter-annual variability in Fv/Fm (between each cruise) was the highest in the SACCZ, while the Antarctic Zone (AZ) exhibited low inter-annual variability. Intra-seasonal variability between the zones was limited to a significantly higher mean Fv/Fm in the PFZ and AZ in early summer compared to late summer. Intra-seasonal variability between the cruises was, however, inconsistent as higher mean Fv/Fm in early summer were seen during some years as opposed to others. Ancillary physical and biogeochemical parameters were also assessed to investigate potential direct and indirect drivers of co-variability with Fv/Fm through a series of statistical t-tests, where significant differences in Fv/Fm were used as focus points to interrogate the plausibility of co-variance. Inter-zonal variability of surface seawater temperature (SST) and Silicate:Phosphate (Si:P) ratios were highlighted as co-varying with Fv/Fm in all zones, whilst community structure played an indirect role in some instances. Similarly, inter-annual variability in Fv/Fm co-varied with SST, Nitrate:Phosphate (N:P) and Si:P ratios in the PFZ, AZ and SACCZ, while community structure influenced inter-annual variability in the PFZ and SACCZ. Intra-seasonal variability in Fv/Fm was linked to all the ancillary parameters, except community structure in the AZ, whilst different ancillary parameters dominated differences during each of the cruises. These results were further scrutinized with a Principal Component Analysis for a subset of co-located data points, where N:P and Si:P ratios emerged as the principal indirect drivers of Fv/Fm variability. This study highlights the scope for using Fv/Fm to reflect the net response of phytoplankton photophysiology to environmental adjustments and accentuates the complex interplay of different physical and biogeochemical parameters that act simultaneously and oftentimes antagonistically, influencing inter-zonal, inter-annual and intra-seasonal variability of Fv/Fm.