Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16_suppl(40), p. e12592-e12592, 2022

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e12592

Wiley Open Access, Cancer Medicine, 5(12), p. 5846-5858, 2022

DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5372

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Integrated tumor genomic and immune microenvironment analysis identifies predictive biomarkers associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for triple‐negative breast cancer

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

e12592 Background: Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is currently the best therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), resistance still occurs in a considerable proportion of TNBC patients, making it crucial to understand resistance mechanisms and identify predictive biomarkers for patient selection. Methods: Biopsy samples were collected from 21 patients with TNBC who underwent NAC. Whole-exome sequencing, targeted sequencing, and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) were carried out on the all clinical samples and used to identify and validate potential biomarkers associated with response to NAC. In addition, data on 190 TNBC patients who had undergone chemotherapy were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and analyzed to further validate our findings. Results: Both the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB) were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders. Higher response rates and longer survival rates were observed in patients with higher TMB. Patients with higher ratios of CD8 to M2 macrophages had higher response rates and improved survival rates. Finally, integrated analysis demonstrated that the combination of TMB and the ratio of CD8 T cells to M2 macrophages could further distinguish responders from non-responders in both enrolled patients and from public data. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicated that the combination of TMB and the ratio of CD8 T cells to M2 macrophages may be a potential biomarker for improving the recognition of NAT responders, thereby providing a basis for developing precision NAT regimens.