Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, Critical Care and Resuscitation, 4(24), p. 330-340, 2022

DOI: 10.51893/2022.4.oa3

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The association between vital signs abnormalities during postanaesthesia care unit stay and deterioration in the general ward following major abdominal cancer surgery assessed by continuous wireless monitoring

Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher
Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vital signs abnormalities in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) may identify patients at risk of severe postoperative complications in the general ward, but are sparsely investigated by continuous monitoring. We aimed to assess if the severity of vital signs abnormalities in the PACU was correlated to the duration of severe vital signs abnormalities and serious adverse events (SAEs) in the general ward. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. Primary exposure was PACU vital signs abnormalities assessed by a standardised PACU recovery score. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients, aged ≥ 60 years, who underwent major abdominal cancer surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The duration of severe vital signs abnormalities were assessed by continuous wireless vital signs monitoring and, secondly, by any SAE within the first 96 hours in the general ward. RESULTS: One-hundred patients were included, and 92 patients with a median of 91 hours (interquartile range, 71–95 hours) of vital signs recording were analysed. The maximum vital signs abnormalities in the PACU were not significantly correlated to overall vital signs abnormalities in the general ward (R = 0.13; P = 0.22). Severe circulatory abnormalities in the overall PACU stay and at discharge were significantly correlated to the duration of circulatory vital signs abnormalities on the ward (R = 0.32 [P = 0.00021] and R = 0.26 [P = 0.014], respectively). Seventeen patients (18%) experienced SAEs, without significant association to the PACU stay (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46–0.73). CONCLUSION: Vital signs abnormalities in the PACU did not show a tendency towards predicting overall severe vital signs abnormalities or SAEs during the first days in the general ward. Circulatory abnormalities in the PACU showed a tendency towards predicting circulatory complications in the ward.