Published in

Springer, Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 7(20), p. 913-922, 2021

DOI: 10.1007/s43630-021-00069-z

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Temperature dependence of nanosecond charge recombination in mutant Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers: modelling of the protein dynamics

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractWe investigated the influence of a range of factors—temperature, redox midpoint potential of an electron carrier, and protein dynamics—on nanosecond electron transfer within a protein. The model reaction was back electron transfer from a bacteriopheophytin anion, HA, to an oxidized primary electron donor, P+, in a wild type Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center (RC) with a permanently reduced secondary electron acceptor (quinone, QA). Also used were two modified RCs with single amino acid mutations near the monomeric bacteriochlorophyll, BA, located between P and HA. Both mutant RCs showed significant slowing down of this back electron transfer reaction with decreasing temperature, similar to that observed with the wild type RC, but contrasting with a number of single point mutant RCs studied previously. The observed similarities and differences are explained in the framework of a (P+BA ↔ P+HA) equilibrium model with an important role played by protein relaxation. The major cause of the observed temperature dependence, both in the wild type RC and in the mutant proteins, is a limitation in access to the thermally activated pathway of charge recombination via the state P+BA at low temperatures. The data indicate that in all RCs both charge recombination pathways, the thermally activated one and a direct one without involvement of the P+BA state, are controlled by the protein dynamics. It is concluded that the modifications of the protein environment affect the overall back electron transfer kinetics primarily by changing the redox potential of BA and not by changing the protein relaxation dynamics.