BackgroundRepeated number of passes, clot fragmentation, and distal embolization during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) lead to worse clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. This study aimed to assess the recanalization and embolic outcomes of different stent-retrievers (SRs): open-tip SR (Solitaire X 6×40 mm), closed-tip SR (EmboTrap II 5×33 mm), and filter-tip SR (NeVa NET 5.5×37 mm).MethodsStiff-friable clot analogs were used to create middle cerebral artery (M1-MCA) occlusions in a benchtop model. After occlusion, experiments were randomized into one of the three treatment arms. The thrombectomy technique consisted of retrieving the SR into a balloon guide catheter under proximal flow arrest and continuous aspiration. A total of 150 single-attempt cases were performed (50 cases/treatment arm). Distal emboli (>100 µm) were collected and analyzed after each experiment.ResultsFilter-tip SR achieved a non-significantly higher first-pass recanalization rate than open-tip SR and closed-tip SR (66% vs 48% vs 44%; P=0.064). Filter-tip SR prevented clot fragments>1 mm from embolizing distal territories in 44% of cases, compared with 16% in open-tip SR and 20% in closed-tip (P=0.003). There were no significant differences between treatment arms in terms of total emboli count (open-tip=19.2±13.1, closed-tip=19.1±10.7, filter-tip=17.2±13.0; P=0.660). Nonetheless, the number of large emboli (>1 mm) and total area of emboli were significantly lower in the filter-tip arm (n=0.88±1.2, A=2.06±1.85 mm²) than in the closed-tip arm (n=2.34±3.38, A=4.06±4.80 mm²; P<0.05).ConclusionsWhen facing fragment-prone clots, the filter-tip SR significantly reduces the number of large clots (>1 mm) that embolize distally during an MT procedure, which in turn may increase the chances of first-pass complete recanalization.