Hogrefe, Journal of Psychology, 1(221), p. 61-62, 2013
DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000131
Full text: Download
The n-2 repetition cost has been explained by persisting inhibition of a previously valid task set which dissipates over time. This account has two implications, namely that the switch cost decreases with the number of tasks involved in switching and that the cost should also be observed in switching between two tasks. Neither of these implications is supported by empirical evidence. An alternative view is briefly discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)