Published in

BMJ Publishing Group, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, p. jnis-2023-020065, 2023

DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020065

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

First pass effect of mechanical thrombectomy for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion: data from the ANGEL-ACT registry

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BackgroundTo explore the incidence, predictors, and association of first pass effect (FPE) on clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) in the Asian population.MethodsWe selected patients from the ANGEL-ACT registry. We defined FPE as complete recanalization after one MT attempt without rescue treatment, multiple pass effect (MPE) as complete recanalization after >1 MT attempt or after one MT attempt with rescue treatment, and incomplete recanalization (ICR) as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score of 2b, independent of the number of MT attempts. We conducted multivariable logistic analyses to identify the independent predictors of FPE and to compare the outcomes, including favorable outcome, mortality within 90 days, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) among the FPE, MPE, and ICR groups.ResultsTwo hundred and seventy-nine patients, 68 with FPE (24.4%), 114 with MPE (40.9%), and 83 with ICR (29.7%), were included. Underlying intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.16, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.34, P<0.001) was independently associated with a low chance of FPE. Furthermore, FPE was associated with a favorable outcome compared with MPE and ICR (MPE vs FPE, aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.97, P=0.040; ICR vs FPE, aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.81, P=0.012), and decreased mortality (MPE vs FPE, aOR 2.57, 95% CI 1.04 to 6.36, P=0.041) compared with MPE but similar mortality to ICR (P=0.374). No difference was found for ICH among the three groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsFPE occurred in 24.4% of patients with VBAO in our cohort, which was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with MPE and ICR. VBAO with underlying ICAD was less likely to achieve FPE.Trial registration numberNCT03370939.