Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2023

DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad032

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Characteristics of Patient Navigation Programs in the Cancer Moonshot ACCSIS Colorectal Cancer Screening Initiative

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background Although patient navigation has shown promise for increasing participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and follow-up, little evidence is available to guide implementation of patient navigation in clinical practice. We characterize eight patient navigation programs being implemented as part of multi-component interventions of the National Cancer Institute's Cancer MoonshotSM Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) initiative. Methods We developed a data collection template organized by ACCSIS framework domains. The template was populated by a representative from each of the eight ACCSIS research projects. We report standardized descriptions of 1) the socio-ecological context in which the navigation program was being conducted; 2) navigation program characteristics; 3) activities undertaken to facilitate program implementation (eg, training); and 4) outcomes used in program evaluation. Results ACCSIS patient navigation programs varied broadly in their socio-ecological context and settings, the populations they served, and in how they were implemented in practice. Six research projects adapted and implemented evidence-based patient navigation programs; the remaining projects developed new programs. Five projects began navigation when patients were due for initial CRC screening; three projects began navigation later in the screening process, when patients were due for follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-test result. Seven projects relied on existing clinical staff to deliver the navigation; one hired a centralized research navigator. All projects plan to evaluate effectiveness and implementation of their programs. Discussion Our detailed program descriptions may facilitate cross-project comparisons and guide future implementation and evaluation of patient navigation programs in clinical practice. Clinicaltrials.gov registration numbers Oregon: NCT04890054 North Carolina: NCT044067 San Diego: NCT04941300 Appalachia: NCT04427527 Chicago: NCT0451434 Oklahoma: Not registered Arizona: Not registered New Mexico: Not registered