Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Emergency Medicine Australasia, 2(34), p. 157-163, 2021

DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13814

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Management of patients presenting with low back pain to a private hospital emergency department in Melbourne, Australia

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveRecent studies suggest many patients with non‐specific low back pain presenting to public hospital EDs receive low‐value care. The primary aim was to describe management of patients presenting with low back pain to the ED of a private hospital in Melbourne, Australia, and received a final ED diagnosis of non‐specific low back pain. We also determined predictors of hospital admission.MethodsRetrospective review of patients who presented with low back pain and received a final ED diagnosis of non‐specific low back pain to Cabrini Malvern ED in 2015. Demographics, lumbar spinal imaging, pathology tests and medications were extracted from hospital records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of hospital admission.ResultsFour hundred and fifty presentations were included (60% female); 238 (52.9%) were admitted to hospital. One hundred and seventy‐seven (39.3%) patients received lumbar spine imaging. Two hundred and eighty (62.2%) patients had pathology tests and 391 (86.9%) received medications, which included opioids (n = 298, 66.2%), paracetamol (n = 219, 48.7%), NSAIDs (n = 161, 35.8%), benzodiazepines (n = 118, 26.2%) and pregabalin (n = 26, 5.8%). Predictors of hospital admission included older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.05), arrival by ambulance (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.06–3.90) and receipt of pathology tests (OR 3.32, 95% CI 2.01–5.49) or computed tomography scans (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.12–3.11).ConclusionWe observed high rates of imaging, pathology tests and hospital admissions compared with previous public hospital studies, while medication use was similar. Implementation of strategies to optimise evidence‐based ED care is needed to reduce low‐value care and improve patient outcomes.