Published in

American Heart Association, Circulation, Suppl_1(147), 2023

DOI: 10.1161/circ.147.suppl_1.p394

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Abstract P394: Initial Antihypertensive Prescribing in Relation to Blood Pressure Among Medicaid and Medicare Recipients

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Introduction: Early treatment for hypertension (HTN) portends better outcomes. However, few real-world studies have assessed initial antiHTN regimens and how they differ by baseline blood pressure (BP). We sought to compare initial treatment patterns, stratified by BP, between Medicaid and Medicare recipients. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of adults with newly-treated HTN in the One Florida+ Consortium(2012-2020) who had linked claims-EHR data from the treatment initiation visit. Eligible patients were Floridians with Medicaid or Medicare aged ≥18 years, with diagnosed HTN, who filled ≥1 first-line antiHTN class with no evidence of anti HTN fills during the year prior (in which continuous insurance enrollment was required). Baseline BP was categorized per current HTN guidelines, and logistic regression was used to estimate age-adjusted odds of combination vs. monotherapy, per 10 mmHg increase in systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP). Results: We included 2,902 patients (47% Medicaid, 53% Medicare); mean age was 44 (Medicaid) and 67 yrs(Medicare); 60% (64% and 56%, respectively) were women and 42% (57% and 29%, respectively) were Black. Initial antiHTN classes were similar comparing cohorts: ACEI, ARB and thiazide initiation varied little by BP category, in contrast to CCBs and β-blockers (Figure, panels A-B). In age-adjusted analyses, use of initial combination therapy was 40% more likely (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11, 1.76) among Medicare recipients and inversely related to BP category (panels C-D) among Medicare patients, in which each 10mmHg greater SBP (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88, 0.97) and DBP (OR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75, 0.90) had lower odds of combination therapy. Among Medicaid recipients, only SBP associated with combination therapy (OR1.11; 95% CI, 1.03, 1.20). Conclusions: We observed similar initial class patterns among Medicaid & Medicare recipients across baseline BP, but differential use of combination therapy was less likely at higher baseline BP in Medicare recipients, which contrasts current guidance.