Published in

Wiley, European Journal of Immunology, 8(51), p. 2040-2050, 2021

DOI: 10.1002/eji.202048943

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

CXCR3 and CXCR5 are highly expressed in HIV‐1‐specific CD8 central memory T cells from infected patients

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractNew ways of characterizing CD8+ memory T cell responses in chronic infections are based on the measurement of chemokine receptor expression (CXCR3, CXCR5, and CX3CR1). We applied these novel phenotyping strategies to chronic HIV infection by comparing healthy donors (HDs), HIV‐infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), and spontaneous HIV controllers (HICs). In all groups, the memory cells exhibited high proportion of CXCR3+ cells. Proportions of CXCR5+ and CX3CR1+ cells were preferentially observed among central memory cells (Tcm) and effector memory cells (Tem) respectively.Chronic controlled HIV infection impacted the chemokine receptor profile of both HIV‐specific and nonspecific CD8+ T cells. In total CD8+ T cells, the proportions of CXCR3CXCR5CX3CR1Tcm and Tem were lower in HIV‐infected patients than in HDs with subtle differences between ART and HICs. Such phenotyping strategy also revealed differences in exhaustion and senescence phenotypes, the CXCR3+CXCR5+CX3CR1 being more exhausted and senescent than the CXCR3+CXCR5CX3CR1 Tcm fraction. Among HIV‐specific CD8+ T cells, the vast majority of Tcm cells were CXCR3+ and CXCR5+ cells in contrast with their nonspecific counterparts.In conclusion, the addition of migration markers contributes to better characterize Tcm/Tem compartment.