Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 3(41), p. 585-595, 2021

DOI: 10.1002/jum.15732

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Ultrasound for Raised Intracranial Pressure

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) ultrasound is becoming increasingly more popular for estimating raised intracranial pressure (ICP). We performed a systematic review and analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ONSD when compared to the standard invasive ICP measurement.MethodWe performed a systematic search of PUBMED and EMBASE for studies including adult patients with suspected elevated ICP and comparing sonographic ONSD measurement to a standard invasive method. Quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS‐2 tool by two independent authors. We used a bivariate model of random effects to summarize pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Heterogeneity was investigated by meta‐regression and sub‐group analyses.ResultsWe included 18 prospective studies (16 studies including 619 patients for primary outcome). Only one study was of low quality, and there was no apparent publication bias. Pooled sensitivity was 0.9 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.85–0.94], specificity was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.8–0.89), and DOR was 46.7 (95% CI: 26.2–83.2) with partial evidence of heterogeneity. The Area‐Under‐the‐Curve of the summary Receiver‐Operator‐Curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95, P < .05). No covariates were significant in the meta‐regression. Subgroup analysis of severe traumatic brain injury and parenchymal ICP found no heterogeneity. ICP and ONSD had a correlation coefficient of 0.7 (95% CI: 0.63–0.76, P < .05).ConclusionONSD is a useful adjunct in ICP evaluation but is currently not a replacement for invasive methods where they are feasible.