Published in

Wiley, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 4(49), p. 358-363, 2009

DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2009.01026.x

Elsevier, Year Book of Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine, (2010), p. 11-12

DOI: 10.1016/s8756-5005(10)79229-5

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Detection and management of decreased fetal movements in Australia and New Zealand: a survey of obstetric practice.

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decreased fetal movement (DFM) is associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. However, there is limited research to inform practice in the detection and management of DFM. AIMS: To identify current practices and views of obstetricians in Australia and New Zealand regarding DFM. METHODS: A postal survey of Fellows and Members, and obstetric trainees of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RESULTS: Of the 1700 surveys distributed, 1066 (63%) were returned, of these, 805 (76% of responders) were currently practising and included in the analysis. The majority considered that asking women about fetal movement should be a part of routine care. Sixty per cent reported maternal perception of DFM for 12 h was sufficient evidence of DFM and 77% DFM for 24 h. KICK charts were used routinely by 39%, increasing to 66% following an episode of DFM. Alarm limits varied, the most commonly reported was