Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Society of Nephrology, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2(35), p. 202-215, 2023

DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000271

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Effects of Empagliflozin on Fluid Overload, Weight, and Blood Pressure in CKD

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Significance Statement SGLT2 inhibitors reduce risk of kidney progression, AKI, and cardiovascular disease, but the mechanisms of benefit are incompletely understood. Bioimpedance spectroscopy can estimate body water and fat mass. One quarter of the EMPA-KIDNEY bioimpedance substudy CKD population had clinically significant levels of bioimpedance-derived “Fluid Overload” at recruitment. Empagliflozin induced a prompt and sustained reduction in “Fluid Overload,” irrespective of sex, diabetes, and baseline N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide or eGFR. No significant effect on bioimpedance-derived fat mass was observed. The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on body water may be one of the contributing mechanisms by which they mediate effects on cardiovascular risk. Background CKD is associated with fluid excess that can be estimated by bioimpedance spectroscopy. We aimed to assess effects of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition on bioimpedance-derived “Fluid Overload” and adiposity in a CKD population. Methods EMPA-KIDNEY was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of empagliflozin 10 mg once daily in patients with CKD at risk of progression. In a substudy, bioimpedance measurements were added to the main trial procedures at randomization and at 2- and 18-month follow-up visits. The substudy's primary outcome was the study-average difference in absolute “Fluid Overload” (an estimate of excess extracellular water) analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures approach. Results The 660 substudy participants were broadly representative of the 6609-participant trial population. Substudy mean baseline absolute “Fluid Overload” was 0.4±1.7 L. Compared with placebo, the overall mean absolute “Fluid Overload” difference among those allocated empagliflozin was −0.24 L (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.38 to −0.11), with similar sized differences at 2 and 18 months, and in prespecified subgroups. Total body water differences comprised between-group differences in extracellular water of −0.49 L (95% CI, −0.69 to −0.30, including the −0.24 L “Fluid Overload” difference) and a −0.30 L (95% CI, −0.57 to −0.03) difference in intracellular water. There was no significant effect of empagliflozin on bioimpedance-derived adipose tissue mass (−0.28 kg [95% CI, −1.41 to 0.85]). The between-group difference in weight was −0.7 kg (95% CI, −1.3 to −0.1). Conclusions In a broad range of patients with CKD, empagliflozin resulted in a sustained reduction in a bioimpedance-derived estimate of fluid overload, with no statistically significant effect on fat mass. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03594110; EuDRACT: 2017-002971-24 (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/).