Published in

Oxford University Press, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1(517), p. 1407-1421, 2022

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2763

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The impact of phase equilibrium cloud models on GCM simulations of GJ 1214b

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigate the impact of clouds on the atmosphere of GJ 1214b using the radiatively coupled, phase-equilibrium cloud model EddySed coupled to the Unified Model general circulation model. We find that, consistent with previous investigations, high metallicity (100 × solar) and clouds with large vertical extents (a sedimentation factor of fsed = 0.1) are required to best match the observations, although metallicities even higher than those investigated here may be required to improve agreement further. We additionally find that in our case which best matches the observations (fsed = 0.1), the velocity structures change relative to the clear sky case with the formation of a superrotating jet being suppressed, although further investigation is required to understand the cause of the suppression. The increase in cloud extent with fsed results in a cooler planet due to a higher albedo, causing the atmosphere to contract. This also results in a reduced day–night contrast seen in the phase curves, although the introduction of cloud still results in a reduction of the phase offset. We additionally investigate the impact the Unified Model’s pseudo-spherical irradiation scheme on the calculation of heating rates, finding that the introduction of nightside shortwave heating results in slower mid-latitude jets compared to the plane-parallel irradiation scheme used in previous works. We also consider the impact of a gamma distribution, as opposed to a lognormal distribution, for the distribution of cloud particle radii and find the impact to be relatively minor.