OBJECTIVE Low-field portable MRI (pMRI) is a recent technological advancement with potential for broad applications. Compared with conventional MRI, pMRI is less resource-intensive with regard to operational costs and scan time. The application of pMRI in neurosurgical oncology has not been previously described. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of pMRI in assessing optic nerve decompression after endoscopic endonasal surgery for sellar and suprasellar pathologies. METHODS Patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery for sellar and suprasellar lesions at a single institution and for whom pMRI and routine MRI were performed postoperatively were retrospectively reviewed to compare the two imaging systems. To assess the relative resolution of pMRI compared with MRI, the distance from the optic chiasm to the top of the third ventricle was measured, and the measurements were compared between paired equivalent slices on T2-weighted coronal images. The inter- and intrarater correlations were analyzed. RESULTS Twelve patients were included in this study (10 with pituitary adenomas and 2 with craniopharyngiomas) with varying degrees of optic chiasm compression on preoperative imaging. Measurements were averaged across raters before calculating agreement between pMRI and MRI, which demonstrated significant interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.78, p < 0.01). Agreement between raters within the pMRI measurements was also significantly reliable (ICC = 0.93, p < 0.01). Finally, a linear mixed-effects model was specified to demonstrate that MRI measurement could be predicted using the pMRI measurement with the patient and rater set as random effects (pMRI β coefficient = 0.80, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that resolution of pMRI is comparable to that of conventional MRI in assessing the optic chiasm position in relation to the third ventricle. Portable MRI sufficiently demonstrates decompression of the optic chiasm after endoscopic endonasal surgery. It can be an alternative strategy in cases in which cost, scan-time considerations, or lack of intraoperative MRI availability may preclude the ability to assess adequate optic nerve decompression after endoscopic endonasal surgery for sellar and suprasellar lesions.