Published in

Wiley, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2(90), p. 483-501, 2023

DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29657

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Latent signal models: Learning compact representations of signal evolution for improved time‐resolved, multi‐contrast MRI

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

PurposeTo improve time‐resolved reconstructions by training auto‐encoders to learn compact representations of Bloch‐simulated signal evolution and inserting the decoder into the forward model.MethodsBuilding on model‐based nonlinear and linear subspace techniques, we train auto‐encoders on dictionaries of simulated signal evolution to learn compact, nonlinear, latent representations. The proposed latent signal model framework inserts the decoder portion of the auto‐encoder into the forward model and directly reconstructs the latent representation. Latent signal models essentially serve as a proxy for fast and feasible differentiation through the Bloch equations used to simulate signal. This work performs experiments in the context of T2‐shuffling, gradient echo EPTI, and MPRAGE‐shuffling. We compare how efficiently auto‐encoders represent signal evolution in comparison to linear subspaces. Simulation and in vivo experiments then evaluate if reducing degrees of freedom by incorporating our proxy for the Bloch equations, the decoder portion of the auto‐encoder, into the forward model improves reconstructions in comparison to subspace constraints.ResultsAn auto‐encoder with 1 real latent variable represents single‐tissue fast spin echo, EPTI, and MPRAGE signal evolution to within 0.15% normalized RMS error, enabling reconstruction problems with 3 degrees of freedom per voxel (real latent variable + complex scaling) in comparison to linear models with 4–8 degrees of freedom per voxel. In simulated/in vivo T2‐shuffling and in vivo EPTI experiments, the proposed framework achieves consistent quantitative normalized RMS error improvement over linear approaches. From qualitative evaluation, the proposed approach yields images with reduced blurring and noise amplification in MPRAGE‐shuffling experiments.ConclusionDirectly solving for nonlinear latent representations of signal evolution improves time‐resolved MRI reconstructions.