Published in

American Heart Association, Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 12(14), p. 1122-1132, 2021

DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.121.012884

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Preoperative Computed Tomography Angiography Reveals Leaflet-Specific Calcification and Excursion Patterns in Aortic Stenosis

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography–based evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) by calcium scoring does not consider interleaflet differences in leaflet characteristics. Here, we sought to examine the functional implications of these differences. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the computed tomography angiograms of 200 male patients with degenerative calcific AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement and 20 male patients with normal aortic valves. We compared the computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived aortic valve leaflet calcification load (AVLC CTA ), appearance, and systolic leaflet excursion (LE sys ) of individual leaflets. We performed computer simulations of normal valves to investigate how interleaflet differences in LE sys affect aortic valve area. We used linear regression to identify predictors of leaflet-specific calcification in patients with AS. Results: In patients with AS, the noncoronary cusp (NCC) carried the greatest AVLC CTA (365.9 [237.3–595.4] Agatston unit), compared to the left coronary cusp (LCC, 278.5 [169.2–478.8] Agatston unit) and the right coronary cusp (RCC, 240.6 [137.3–439.0] Agatston unit; both P <0.001). However, LCC conferred the least LE sys (42.8° [38.8°–49.0°]) compared to NCC (44.8° [41.1°–49.78°], P =0.001) and RCC (47.7° [42.0°–52.3°], P <0.001) and was more often characterized as predominantly thickened (23.5%) compared to NCC (12.5%) and RCC (16.5%). Computer simulations of normal valves revealed greater reductions in aortic valve area following closures of NCC (−32.2 [−38.4 to −25.8]%) and RCC (−35.7 [−40.2 to −32.9]%) than LCC (−24.5 [−28.5 to −18.3]%; both P <0.001). By linear regression, the AVLC CTA of NCC and RCC, but not LCC, predicted LE sys (both P <0.001) in patients with AS. Both ostial occlusion and ostial height of the right coronary artery predicted AVLC CTA, RCC ( P =0.005 and P =0.001). Conclusions: In male patients, the AVLC CTA of NCC and RCC contribute more to AS than that of LCC. LCC’s propensity for noncalcific leaflet thickening and worse LE sys , however, should not be underestimated when using calcium scores to assess AS severity.