Published in

Oxford University Press, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2024

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stae198

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Potential biases and prospects for the Hubble constant estimation via electromagnetic and gravitational-wave joint analyses

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract GW170817 is a binary neutron star merger that exhibited a gravitational wave (GW) and a gamma-ray burst, followed by an afterglow. In this work, we estimate the Hubble constant (H0) using broad-band afterglow emission and relativistic jet motion from the Very Long Baseline Interferometry and Hubble Space Telescope images of GW170817. Compared to previous attempts, we combine these messengers with GW in a simultaneous Bayesian fit. We probe the H0 measurement robustness depending on the data set used, the assumed jet model, the possible presence of a late time flux excess. Using the sole GW leads to a 20 per cent error ($77^{+21}_{-10}$ $\rm km\, s^{-1}\, Mpc^{-1}$, medians, 16th-84th percentiles), because of the degeneracy between viewing angle (θv) and luminosity distance (dL). The latter is reduced by the inclusion in the fit of the afterglow light curve, leading to $H_0=96^{+13}_{-10}$ $\rm km\, s^{-1}\, Mpc^{-1}$, a large value, caused by the fit preference for high viewing angles due to the possible presence of a late-time excess in the afterglow flux. Accounting for the latter by including a constant flux component at late times brings $H_0=78.5^{+7.9}_{-6.4}$ $\rm km\, s^{-1}\, Mpc^{-1}$. Adding the centroid motion in the analysis efficiently breaks the dL − θv degeneracy and overcome the late-time deviations, giving $H_0 = 69.0^{+4.4}_{-4.3}$ $\rm km\, s^{-1}\, Mpc^{-1}$ (in agreement with Planck and SH0ES measurements) and $\theta _v = 18.2^{+1.2}_{-1.5}$ deg. This is valid regardless of the jet structure assumption. Our simulations show that for next GW runs radio observations are expected to provide at most few other similar events.