Published in

Wiley, NMR in Biomedicine, 9(36), 2023

DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4942

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Single‐heartbeat cardiac cine imaging via jointly regularized nonrigid motion‐corrected reconstruction

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of the current study was to develop a novel approach for 2D breath‐hold cardiac cine imaging from a single heartbeat, by combining cardiac motion‐corrected reconstructions and nonrigidly aligned patch‐based regularization. Conventional cardiac cine imaging is obtained via motion‐resolved reconstructions of data acquired over multiple heartbeats. Here, we achieve single‐heartbeat cine imaging by incorporating nonrigid cardiac motion correction into the reconstruction of each cardiac phase, in conjunction with a motion‐aligned patch‐based regularization. The proposed Motion‐Corrected CINE (MC‐CINE) incorporates all acquired data into the reconstruction of each (motion‐corrected) cardiac phase, resulting in a better posed problem than motion‐resolved approaches. MC‐CINE was compared with iterative sensitivity encoding (itSENSE) and Extra‐Dimensional Golden Angle Radial Sparse Parallel (XD‐GRASP) in 14 healthy subjects in terms of image sharpness, reader scoring (range: 1–5) and reader ranking (range: 1–9) of image quality, and single‐slice left ventricular assessment. MC‐CINE was significantly superior to both itSENSE and XD‐GRASP using 20 heartbeats, two heartbeats, and one heartbeat. Iterative SENSE, XD‐GRASP, and MC‐CINE achieved a sharpness of 74%, 74%, and 82% using 20 heartbeats, and 53%, 66%, and 82% with one heartbeat, respectively. The corresponding results for reader scoring were 4.0, 4.7, and 4.9 with 20 heartbeats, and 1.1, 3.0, and 3.9 with one heartbeat. The corresponding results for reader ranking were 5.3, 7.3, and 8.6 with 20 heartbeats, and 1.0, 3.2, and 5.4 with one heartbeat. MC‐CINE using a single heartbeat presented nonsignificant differences in image quality to itSENSE with 20 heartbeats. MC‐CINE and XD‐GRASP at one heartbeat both presented a nonsignificant negative bias of less than 2% in ejection fraction relative to the reference itSENSE. It was concluded that the proposed MC‐CINE significantly improves image quality relative to itSENSE and XD‐GRASP, enabling 2D cine from a single heartbeat.