Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Social Science Quarterly, 5(102), p. 2055-2069, 2021

DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13037

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Should I stay or should I go? Embracing causal heterogeneity in the study of pandemic policy and citizen behavior

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo test for multicausality between government policy, health outcomes, economic performance, and citizen behavior during the COVID‐19 global pandemic.MethodsWe perform Granger‐causality tests to explore the interrelationship between four endogenous variables, social distancing policy, home isolation, balance rate, and average weekly COVID‐19 deaths, in the 26 states of Brazil. As exogenous variables, we included a linear time trend and a dummy for the week in which the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID‐19 a global pandemic.ResultsOur analysis of Granger causal ordering between the four variables demonstrates that there is significant heterogeneity across the Brazilian federation. These findings can be interpreted as underscoring that there is no common model applicable to all states, and that the dynamics are context‐dependent.ConclusionOur suggested approach allows researchers to account for the complex interrelationship between government policy, citizen behavior, the economy, and COVID‐related health outcomes.