Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 12(50), p. 1508-1517, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/joor.13564

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Muscle activity between dentate and edentulous patients rehabilitated with dental prostheses: A systematic review

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAdequate muscle activity is important for the success of oral rehabilitation: it maintains the integrity of the stomatognathic system and is responsible for chewing movements needed to break, crush and grind food.ObjectiveTo compare muscle activity using electromyography (EMG) while clenching or chewing soft and/or hard foods among individuals with natural dentition (ND) and edentulous patients rehabilitated with dental prostheses.MethodsThis review was conducted until March, 2023, and the research question was “Is the muscle activity of edentulous patients rehabilitated with dental prostheses similar to that of dentate individuals?” A search strategy was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Lilacs, Embase and manual journal searches.ResultsTen studies were included in the analysis. Most of them reported that individuals with ND had significant higher muscle activity (clenching or chewing) than complete dentures (CD) users. However, no difference was observed between patients with full mouth implant‐supported fixed dental prosthesis (ISFDP) and ND. Additionally, two studies compared patients with mandibular ISFDP with maxillary CD and individuals with ND and found no differences; however, one study concluded that patients with ISFDP with CD (maxillary or mandibular) had lower muscle activity than individuals with ND. Only one study reported a higher muscle activity in patients with full‐mouth ISFDP than in individuals with ND.ConclusionsBimaxillary CD users had lower muscle activity than individuals with ND. During rehabilitation, the muscle activity of patients with full‐mouth ISFDP and mandibular ISFDP with maxillary CD is similar to individuals with ND.