Published in

Oxford University Press, European Heart Journal – Digital Health, 2023

DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad081

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Artificial intelligence-based identification of left ventricular systolic dysfunction from 12-lead electrocardiograms: External validation and advanced application of an existing model

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background The diagnostic application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models to detect cardiovascular diseases from electrocardiograms (ECG) evolves and promising results were reported. However, external validation is not available for all published algorithms. Aim of this study was to validate an existing algorithm for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) from 12-lead ECGs. Methods and results Patients with digitalized data pairs of 12-lead ECGs and echocardiography (at intervals of ≤7 days) were retrospectively selected from the Heart Center Leipzig ECG and electronic medical records databases. A previously developed AI-based model was applied to ECGs and calculated probabilities for LVSD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was computed overall and in cohorts stratified for baseline and ECG characteristics. Repeated echocardiography studies recorded ≥3 months after index diagnostics were used for follow-up (FU) analysis. At baseline, 42,291 ECG-echocardiography pairs were analyzed and AUROC for LVSD detection was 0.88. Sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 77% for the optimal LVSD-probability cutoff based on Youden’s J. AUROCs were lower in ECG-subgroups with tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and wide QRS complexes. In patients without LVSD at baseline and available FU, model-generated high probability for LVSD was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of developing LVSD during FU. Conclusion We provide the external validation of an existing AI-based ECG-analyzing model for the detection of LVSD with robust performance metrics. The association of false positive LVSD screenings at baseline with a deterioration of ventricular function during FU deserves a further evaluation in prospective trials.