AbstractBackgroundSaliva, salivary glands, gingival crevicular fluid, and supragingival biofilms may harbor SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA. This observational study aimed to investigate the presence and load of SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA in supragingival, and subgingival biofilms obtained from intensive care unit (ICU) patients.MethodsA convenience sample, composed of 52 COVID‐19+ participants (48.6 ± 14.8 years, 26.9% females), were evaluated for pre‐existing comorbidities, number of teeth, and periodontal data [visible plaque (VPI), bleeding on probing (BOP), periodontal probing depth (PPD), and attachment loss (AL)]. Supragingival and subgingival samples (SubDeep: four sites with the deepest PPD; SubRemain: remaining shallower sites) were analyzed by RT‐qPCR with corresponding cycle quantification (Cq). Statistical analyses considered the individual (P = 5%).ResultsTwenty‐six participants tested positive for dental biofilms (Biofilm+) with 96.2% of them being positive for subgingival samples. Pre‐existing comorbidities, number of teeth examined, VPI, PPD, AL, and BOP were similar between Biofilm+ and Biofilm‐. SubDeep PPD (3.72 ± 0.86), AL (4.34 ± 1.33), and % of BOP (66.0 ± 31.1) values were significantly greater compared to SubRemain values (2.84 ± 0.48, 3.37 ± 0.34, and 20.4 ± 24.1, respectively). Biofilm+ Cqs showed no association with the periodontal condition. Cqs from Nasopharynx/Oropharynx (Naso/Oro; n = 36) were similar between Biofilm+ and Biofilm‐ participants. Length of time since ICU intake, last Naso/Oro RT‐qPCR readings, onset of COVID‐19 symptoms, and biofilm samplings were greater for Biofilm‐.ConclusionsICU patients harbored SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA in supragingival and subgingival biofilms, irrespective of the periodontal condition, and systemic viral load. The high number of positive patients highlights the need to better understand this habit to provide adequate oral care.