Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Advances in Anatomic Pathology, 1(29), p. 25-36, 2021

DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000318

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Sampling and Reporting of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Journal article published in 2021 by Ian S. Brown ORCID, Cheng Liu, Gregory C. Miller
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Pathologists have an important and expanding role in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. This role includes the initial diagnosis of the disease, assessment of the response to treatment and the identification of short-term complications such as cytomegalovirus infection and long-term complications such as dysplasia. Furthermore, the assessment of resection specimens for complication of disease is important to determining the risk of subsequent disease or inflammation within an ileal pouch. Adequate sampling of the disease at endoscopy and from the surgical resection specimen is vital to determining the ultimate information that can be provided by the pathologist. This sampling is determined by the clinical scenario. Similarly, a standardized approach to reporting and synthesizing the histologic findings will improve patient management. This is best exemplified by the increasing interest in histologic activity indices, such as the Nancy index in ulcerative colitis, and in the standardized reporting for inflammatory bowel disease dysplasia recommended by the SCENIC international consensus.