AbstractObjectivesTo compare and validate the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT scores for PMR; and to explore their association with clinical factors.MethodsThis retrospective study included 39 consecutive patients diagnosed with PMR and 19 PMR comparators. The final clinical diagnosis was established after 6 months follow-up. Patients underwent FDG-PET/CT prior to glucocorticoid treatment. Visual grading of FDG uptake was performed at 30 anatomic sites. Three FDG-PET/CT scores (the Leuven Score, two Besançon Scores) and two algorithms (the Saint-Etienne and Heidelberg Algorithms) were investigated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with area under the curve (AUC) was performed. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed at predefined cut-off points.ResultsAll three FDG-PET/CT scores showed high diagnostic accuracy for a clinical diagnosis of PMR in the ROC analysis (AUC 0.889–0.914). The Leuven Score provided a sensitivity of 89.7% and specificity of 84.2% at its predefined cut-off point. A simplified Leuven Score showed similar diagnostic accuracy to that of the original score. The Besançon Scores showed limited specificity at their predefined cut-off points (i.e. 47.4% and 63.2%), while ROC analysis suggested that substantially higher cut-off points are needed for these scores. The Heidelberg and Saint-Etienne Algorithms demonstrated high sensitivity, but lower specificity (i.e. 78.9% and 42.1%, respectively) for PMR. Female sex and presence of large-vessel vasculitis were associated with lower FDG-PET/CT scores in patients with PMR.ConclusionThe Leuven Score showed the highest diagnostic utility for PMR. A modified, concise version of the Leuven Score provided similar diagnostic accuracy to that of the original score.