Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Journal of Viral Hepatitis, 11(28), p. 1635-1642, 2021

DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13600

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Positive predictive value of sustained virologic response 4 weeks posttreatment for achieving sustained virologic response 12 weeks posttreatment in patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractSustained virologic response at posttreatment Week 12 (SVR12) is the widely accepted efficacy endpoint for direct‐acting antiviral agents. Those with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are presenting younger with milder liver disease, potentially reducing need for long‐term liver posttreatment monitoring. This analysis aimed to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of SVR at posttreatment Week 4 (SVR4) for achieving SVR12 in patients with HCV, without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in clinical trials. An integrated dataset from 20 Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of G/P was evaluated in patients with 8‐, 12‐ or 16‐week treatment duration consistent with the current label (label‐consistent group), and in all patients regardless of treatment duration consistency with the current label (overall group). Sensitivity analyses handled missing data either by backward imputation or were excluded. SVR4 PPV, negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity were calculated for achieving SVR12 in both groups, and by treatment duration in the label‐consistent group. SVR was defined as HCV ribonucleic acid <lower limit of quantification. The label‐consistent group and overall group included 2890 and 4390 patients, respectively. PPV of SVR4 for SVR12 was >99% in both groups regardless of treatment duration. Not achieving SVR4 had 100% NPV and sensitivity for all groups. SVR4 measure had 79.5% specificity for identifying patients who did not achieve SVR12. Across 20 Phase 2/3 clinical trials of G/P, SVR4 was highly predictive of SVR12. Long‐term follow‐up to confirm SVR may not be necessary for certain populations of patients with HCV.