Published in

Wiley, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 3(63), p. 469-472, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13656

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Subgroup effects should be examined using both relative and absolute effect measures

Journal article published in 2023 by Peter Socha ORCID, Sam Harper ORCID, Jennifer A. Hutcheon ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Treatment effects can be measured on the relative scale (eg, risk ratios, odds ratios) or the absolute scale (eg, risk differences). If the baseline risk of an outcome is different between subgroups, the effect of the treatment will differ between subgroups on at least one scale (relative, absolute, or both). We illustrate this using two examples from the literature where only relative effects were estimated, but conclusions about subgroup differences would likely have changed had absolute effects also been considered. To identify all meaningful subgroup differences, researchers and clinicians should compare effects on the relative and absolute scale.