Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Astronomical Society, Astrophysical Journal, 1(935), p. 31, 2022

DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac75f0

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Weak Mass Loss from the Red Supergiant Progenitor of the Type II SN 2021yja

Journal article published in 2022 by Griffin Hosseinzadeh ORCID, Charles D. Kilpatrick ORCID, Yize Dong ORCID, David J. Sand ORCID, Jennifer E. Andrews ORCID, K. Azalee Bostroem ORCID, Daryl Janzen ORCID, Jacob E. Jencson ORCID, Michael Lundquist ORCID, Nicolás Meza ORCID, Jeniveve Pearson ORCID, Stefano Valenti ORCID, Samuel Wyatt ORCID, Jamison Burke ORCID, Daichi Hiramatsu ORCID and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract We present high-cadence optical, ultraviolet (UV), and near-infrared data of the nearby (D ≈ 23 Mpc) Type II supernova (SN) 2021yja. Many Type II SNe show signs of interaction with circumstellar material (CSM) during the first few days after explosion, implying that their red supergiant (RSG) progenitors experience episodic or eruptive mass loss. However, because it is difficult to discover SNe early, the diversity of CSM configurations in RSGs has not been fully mapped. SN 2021yja, first detected within ≈ 5.4 hours of explosion, shows some signatures of CSM interaction (high UV luminosity and radio and x-ray emission) but without the narrow emission lines or early light-curve peak that can accompany CSM. Here we analyze the densely sampled early light curve and spectral series of this nearby SN to infer the properties of its progenitor and CSM. We find that the most likely progenitor was an RSG with an extended envelope, encompassed by low-density CSM. We also present archival Hubble Space Telescope imaging of the host galaxy of SN 2021yja, which allows us to place a stringent upper limit of ≲ 9 M on the progenitor mass. However, this is in tension with some aspects of the SN evolution, which point to a more massive progenitor. Our analysis highlights the need to consider progenitor structure when making inferences about CSM properties, and that a comprehensive view of CSM tracers should be made to give a fuller view of the last years of RSG evolution.