Published in

IOP Publishing, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 11(2023), p. 046, 2023

DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/046

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Leveraging SN Ia spectroscopic similarity to improve the measurement of H <sub>0</sub>

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Recent studies suggest spectroscopic differences explain a fraction of the variation in Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) luminosities after light-curve/color standardization. In this work, (i) we empirically characterize the variations of standardized SN Ia luminosities, and (ii) we use a spectroscopically inferred parameter, SIP, to improve the precision of SNe Ia along the distance ladder and the determination of the Hubble constant (H 0). First, we show that the Pantheon+ covariance model modestly overestimates the uncertainty of standardized magnitudes by ∼ 7%, in the parameter space used by the SH0ES Team to measure H 0; accounting for this alone yields H 0 = 73.01 ± 0.92 km s-1 Mpc-1. Furthermore, accounting for spectroscopic similarity between SNe Ia on the distance ladder reduces their relative scatter to ∼ 0.12 mag per object (compared to ∼ 0.14 mag previously). Combining these two findings in the model of SN covariance, we find an overall 14% reduction (to ± 0.85 km s-1 Mpc-1) of the uncertainty in the Hubble constant and a modest increase in its value. Including a budget for systematic uncertainties itemized by Riess et al. (2022a), we report an updated local Hubble constant with ∼ 1.2% uncertainty, H 0 = 73.29 ± 0.90 km s-1 Mpc-1. We conclude that spectroscopic differences among photometrically standardized SNe Ia do not explain the “Hubble tension”. Rather, accounting for such differences increases its significance, as the discrepancy against ΛCDM calibrated by the Planck 2018 measurement rises to 5.7σ.