Published in

arXiv, 2021

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.07203

Oxford University Press, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 4(516), p. 5799-5815, 2022

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2543

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Cosmic shear in harmonic space from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data: compatibility with configuration space results

Journal article published in 2022 by H. Camacho, F. Andrade-Oliveira, A. Troja, R. Rosenfeld, L. Faga, R. Gomes, C. Doux ORCID, X. Fang ORCID, M. Lima, V. Miranda ORCID, T. F. Eifler, O. Friedrich, M. Gatti, G. M. Bernstein, J. Blazek and other authors.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

ABSTRACT We perform a cosmic shear analysis in harmonic space using the first year of data collected by the Dark Energy Survey (DES-Y1). We measure the cosmic weak lensing shear power spectra using the metacalibration catalogue and perform a likelihood analysis within the framework of CosmoSIS. We set scale cuts based on baryonic effects contamination and model redshift and shear calibration uncertainties as well as intrinsic alignments. We adopt as fiducial covariance matrix an analytical computation accounting for the mask geometry in the Gaussian term, including non-Gaussian contributions. A suite of 1200 lognormal simulations is used to validate the harmonic space pipeline and the covariance matrix. We perform a series of stress tests to gauge the robustness of the harmonic space analysis. Finally, we use the DES-Y1 pipeline in configuration space to perform a similar likelihood analysis and compare both results, demonstrating their compatibility in estimating the cosmological parameters S8, σ8, and Ωm. We use the DES-Y1 metacalibration shape catalogue, with photometric redshifts estimates in the range of 0.2−1.3, divided in four tomographic bins finding σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5 = 0.766 ± 0.033 at 68 per cent CL. The methods implemented and validated in this paper will allow us to perform a consistent harmonic space analysis in the upcoming DES data.