Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Springer, Journal of Neurology, 10(269), p. 5521-5530, 2022

DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11203-x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Serum anti-NMDA-receptor antibodies and cognitive function after ischemic stroke (PROSCIS-B)

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Objective We aimed to investigate whether serum anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor GluN1 (previously NR1) antibody (NMDAR1-abs) seropositivity impacts cognitive function (CF) in the long term following ischemic stroke. Methods Data were used from the PROSpective Cohort with Incident Stroke-Berlin. NMDAR1-abs (IgM/IgA/IgG) were measured with cell-based assays from serum obtained within 7 days after the first-ever stroke. Seropositivity was defined as titers ≥ 1:10, low titers as ≤ 1:100 and high titers as > 1:100. We assessed CF at 1, 2 and 3 years after stroke with the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) and used crude and propensity score adjusted inverse probability weighted generalized linear models to estimate the impact of NMDAR1-abs serostatus on TICS-m. Results Data on NMDAR1-abs (median day of sampling = 4[IQR = 2–5]) were available in 583/621 PROSCIS-B patients (39% female; median NIHSS = 2[IQR = 1–4]; median MMSE = 28[IQR:26–30]), of whom 76(13%) were seropositive (IgM: n = 48/IgA: n = 43/IgG: n = 2). Any NMDAR1-abs seropositivity had no impact on TICS-m compared to seronegative patients (βcrude = 0.69[95%CI = – 0.84 to 2.23]; βadjusted = 0.65[95%CI = – 1.00 to 2.30]). Patients with low titers scored better on TICS-m compared to seronegative patients (βcrude = 2.33[95%CI = 0.76 to 3.91]; βadjusted = 2.47[95%CI = 0.75 to 4.19]); in contrast, patients with high titers scored lower on TICS-m (βcrude = –2.82[95%CI = – 4.90 to – 0.74], βadjusted = – 2.96[95%CI = – 5.13 to – 0.80]), compared to seronegative patients. Conclusion In our study, NMDAR1-abs seropositivity did not affect CF over 3 years after a first mild to moderate ischemic stroke. CF differed according to NMDAR1-abs serum titer, with patients with high NMDAR1-abs titers having a less favorable cognitive outcome compared to seronegative patients.