Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Simulation in Healthcare, 6(18), p. 367-374, 2023

DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000715

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Crisis Scenarios for Simulation-Based Nontechnical Skills Training for Cardiac Surgery Teams

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background Nontechnical skills in cardiac surgery are vital in ensuring patient safety in the operating room (OR). To train these skills in a simulation-based scenario, a collection of commonly accepted crisis scenarios is needed to serve as a framework for a simulation-based training program. Objective The objective of this study was to identify and reach consensus on a collection of relevant crisis scenarios in cardiac surgery suitable for simulation-based team training focusing on nontechnical skills. Methods Using the Delphi method, a national assessment was performed among cardiac surgeons, cardiac anesthesiologists, clinical perfusionists, and cardiac OR nurses in the Netherlands. In the first Delphi round, potential crisis scenarios for simulation-based team training in cardiac surgery were identified. In the second round, the identified scenarios were rated using a 5-point Likert scale. Finally, based on consensus (two-thirds majority), scenarios were prioritized and explored for feasibility. Results One hundred fourteen experts participated in the study (26 cardiac anesthesiologists, 24 cardiac surgeons, 25 clinical perfusionists, and 39 OR nurses), representing all 16 cardiac surgical centers in the Netherlands. In the first round, 237 scenarios were identified. After eliminating duplicates and grouping similar scenarios, 44 scenarios were scored in round 2, which finally resulted in 13 relevant crisis scenarios with an expert consensus higher than 67%. Conclusions Thirteen crisis scenarios relevant to simulation-based team training were identified by an expert panel consisting of all members of the cardiac surgical team. Further research is needed to evaluate the educational value of the respective scenarios.