Published in

Wiley, BJU International, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/bju.16121

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The immune‐related adverse events paradox in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer after atezolizumab immunotherapy: analysis of individual patient data from IMvigor210 and IMvigor211 trials

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the association between immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) and oncological outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and whether the administration of systemic corticosteroids diminishes therapeutic impact.Patients and MethodsThe association between irAEs occurrence and clinical progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) was tested by means of multivariable Cox or competing‐risks regression, when appropriate. Patients experiencing irAEs were further stratified based on systemic corticosteroids administration. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by repeating all the analyses with median time to irAE as landmark point.ResultsWe relied on individual participant data from two prospective trials for advanced urothelial cancer: IMvigor210 and IMvigor211. A total of 896 patients who received atezolizumab for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer were considered. Overall, irAEs were recorded in 195 patients and the median time to irAEs was 64 days. On multivariable analysis, irAEs were inversely associated with the risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–0.61; P < 0.001), overall mortality (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41–0.64; P < 0.001), and cancer‐specific mortality (subdistributional HR [sHR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.45–0.72; P < 0.001). Moreover, our results did not refute the supposition that the administration of systemic corticosteroids does not impact oncological outcomes (PFS: HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.62–1.34, P = 0.629; OS: HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.51–1.64, P = 0.613; CSS: sHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.60–1.36, P = 0.630). The sensitivity analysis confirmed our findings.ConclusionsThe development of irAEs while receiving atezolizumab treatment was associated with improved oncological outcomes, namely overall and cancer‐specific mortality, and PFS. These findings seem to not be substantially affected by administration of systemic corticosteroids.