Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 2(73), p. 210-216, 2021

DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000003186

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale: A Reliable and Valid Tool to Score Stool Consistency in Dutch (Non)Toilet-trained Toddlers

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the study was to assess whether the modified Bristol Stool Form Scale (m-BSFS) is reliable, valid and user-friendly to use by parents, grandparents, and day childcare employees to evaluate stool consistency in toilet and nontoilet-trained toddlers in the Netherlands. Study design: Translation to Dutch and validity of the m-BSFS (scoring 32 general stool pictures) for 1 to 3 year old toddlers (n = 89) was evaluated by parents, grandparents, and day childcare employees. A subgroup of participants scored an additional 7 pictures of stools in a diaper to validate the m-BSFS for non-toilet-trained toddlers (n = 16). To determine inter-rater reliability, 2-way random effects single-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)consistency was used. Intra-rater reliability was measured by Cohen kappa (κ) by rating the same pictures in random order twice, with at least 1 week between the first and second scoring. Results: Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the m-BSFS were above recommended minimal standards of 0.61 for the 32 general stool pictures as well as for the 7 pictures of stools in a diaper. ICCconsistency for the general stool pictures of the first and second ratings were 0.71 (n = 89) and 0.79 (n = 77), respectively, with a κ of 0.71 (n = 77). ICCconsistency for the stools in diaper pictures of the first and second ratings were 0.93 (n = 16) and 0.93 (n = 15), respectively, with a κ of 0.77 (n = 15). Conclusions: The m-BSFS is reliable, valid and user-friendly to use by Dutch-speaking parents, grandparents, and day childcare workers to evaluate stool consistency in both toilet- and nontoilet-trained toddlers in the Netherlands.