Published in

IOP Publishing, Journal of Breath Research, 4(17), p. 046010, 2023

DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/acf066

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Diagnostic accuracy of eNose ‘breathprints’ for therapeutic drug monitoring of Tacrolimus trough levels in lung transplantation

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract In order to prevent long-term immunity-related complications after lung transplantation, close monitoring of immunosuppressant levels using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is paramount. Novel electronic nose (eNose) technology may be a non-invasive alternative to the current invasive procedures for TDM. We investigated the diagnostic and categorization capacity of eNose breathprints for Tacrolimus trough blood plasma levels (TACtrough) in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). We performed eNose measurements in stable LTR attending the outpatient clinic. We evaluated (1) the correlation between eNose measurements and TACtrough, (2) the diagnostic capacity of eNose technology for TACtrough, and (3) the accuracy of eNose technology for categorization of TACtrough into three clinically relevant categories (low: <7 µg ml−1, medium: 7–10 µg ml−1, and high: >10 µg ml−1 ). A total of 186 measurements from 86 LTR were included. There was a weak but statistically significant correlation (r = 0.21, p = 0.004) between the eNose measurements and TACtrough. The root mean squared error of prediction for the diagnostic capacity was 3.186 in the training and 3.131 in the validation set. The accuracy of categorization ranged between 45%–63% for the training set and 52%–69% in the validation set. There is a weak correlation between eNose breathprints and TACtrough in LTR. However, the diagnostic as well as categorization capacity for TACtrough using eNose breathprints is too inaccurate to be applicable in TDM.