Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Andrology, 6(9), p. 1843-1852, 2021

DOI: 10.1111/andr.13071

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Infertile couples still undergo assisted reproductive treatments without initial andrological evaluation in the real‐life setting: A failure to adhere to guidelines?

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe EAU guidelines on male sexual and reproductive health state that both partners of the infertile couple should undergo simultaneous investigation.ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence and the characteristics of infertile men who were referred for an andrological evaluation after failed attempts of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) with those who were evaluated at the beginning of their infertility pathway at a single academic centre over a 17‐year period.Materials and methodsData of 3213 primary infertile couples assessed between 2003 and 2020 were analysed. Descriptive statistics compared the overall characteristics of male partners of couples with (+ART) or without (–ART) previous ART prior to andrological consultation. Logistic regression models analysed variables associated with +ART. Local polynomial regression models explored the probability of +ART over the analysed time frame.ResultsOf all, 493 (15.3%) participants were +ART. Patients and female partners’ age was higher in +ART couples (all p ≤ 0.04). Sperm concentration, progressive sperm motility and normal sperm morphology were lower in +ART than in –ART patients (all p < 0.001), along with a greater percentage of non‐obstructive azoospermia in +ART compared to –ART men (p < 0.0001). At univariable analysis, patient age and partner age >35 years and a less recent assessment were associated with +ART status (all p ≤ 0.04). Male age and less recent years of assessment were also independent predictors of +ART, after accounting for partner's age >35 years (all p < 0.01). A not significant decrease of this pattern was observed throughout the last 7 years at local polynomial regression models.DiscussionOverall awareness towards the importance of a comprehensive evaluation for the male partner of every infertile couple should therefore be further strengthened.ConclusionsApproximately 15% of couples still undergo ART without any initial andrological evaluation in the real‐life setting. A not significant decrease in this trend was observed over most recent years.