Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Ubiquity Press, Computational Psychiatry, 1(7), 2023

DOI: 10.5334/cpsy.94

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Inferring trajectories of psychotic disorders using dynamic causal modeling

Journal article published in 2023 by Jingwen Jin ORCID, Peter Zeidman ORCID, Karl J. Friston ORCID, Roman Kotov ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Introduction. Illness course plays a crucial role in delineating psychiatric disorders. However, existing nosologies consider only its most basic features (e.g., symptom sequence, duration). We developed an application of Dynamic Causal Model (DCM) that characterizes course patterns more fully using dense timeseries data. This foundational study introduces the new modelling approach and evaluates its validity using empirical and simulated data. Methods. A three-level DCM was constructed to model how latent dynamics produce symptoms of depression, mania, and psychosis. This model was fit to symptom scores of 9 patients collected prospectively over four years, following first hospitalization. Simulated subjects based on these empirical data were used to evaluate model parameters at the subject-level. At the group-level, we tested the accuracy with which the DCM can estimate the latent course patterns using Parametric Empirical Bayes (PEB) and leave-one-out cross-validation. Results. Analyses of empirical data showed that DCM accurately captured symptom trajectories for all 9 subjects. Simulation results showed that parameters could be estimated accurately (correlations between generative and estimated parameters >= 0.76). Moreover, the model could distinguish different latent course patterns, with PEB correctly assigning simulated patients for 8 of 9 course patterns. When testing two specific course patterns, leave-one-out cross-validation correctly assigned 23 out of 24 virtual subjects. Conclusion. DCM has been widely used in neuroscience to infer latent neuronal processes from neuroimaging data. Our findings highlight the potential of adopting this methodology for modeling symptom trajectories to explicate nosologic entities, temporal patterns that define them, and facilitate personalized treatment.