Published in

American Geophysical Union, Water Resources Research, 9(58), 2022

DOI: 10.1029/2022wr031997

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Hydrological Droughts of 2017–2018 Explained by the Bayesian Reconstruction of GRACE(‐FO) Fields

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractHydrological droughts are events of prolonged water scarcity and cause many devastating impacts. It is, therefore, extremely crucial to understand their spatiotemporal evolution to guide prevention and mitigation policies. The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE, April 2002–June 2017) and GRACE Follow‐On (GRACE‐FO, June 2018 until the present) missions have been used to study large‐scale droughts of almost two decades. But characterizing droughts during the between missions gap period of 2017 and 2018 has not been well addressed and will be covered here. To bridge the gap, an innovative Bayesian convolutional neural network is developed to reconstruct the missing signals from hydroclimatic inputs. The reconstruction fields and existing signals are then used to explore regions that have experienced consecutive water storage deficits during the 2017–2018 gap. We found many regions of the northern midlatitudes exhibiting moderate to exceptional droughts in terms of water storage deficits, among which parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan, and Iberian Peninsula experienced exceptional droughts lasting for more than 1 year with the maximum deficits (−4.4 ± 0.8 and −7.2 ± 1.1 cm, respectively) being over 50% of the seasonal storage variations. Comparisons with climate indicators show that the identified droughts are predominantly caused by continuous below‐normal precipitation. The recovery process correlates generally well with the accumulation rate of precipitation surpluses (the correlation coefficient (R) can be up to 0.92). Besides, the reconstructed signals, which have R > 0.7 with the testing GRACE(‐FO) data in over 90% of the globe, reliably maintain the data continuity and therefore they are recommended for hydro‐climatological studies.