Published in

Nature Research, Scientific Reports, 1(13), 2023

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25845-4

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Blending controlled-release urea and urea under ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching improves yield while mitigating carbon footprint in rainfed potato

Journal article published in 2023 by Mengyuan Sun, Bin Ma, Peina Lu, Jianhui Bai, Junzhen Mi, Jinghui Liu
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractRidge-furrow with plastic film mulching and various urea types have been applied in rainfed agriculture, but their interactive effects on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield and especially environments remain poorly understood. A three-year experiment was conducted to explore the responses of tuber yield, methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, net global warming potential (NGWP), carbon footprint (CF), and net ecosystem economic budget (NEEB) of rainfed potato to two mulching practices [plastic film mulching (RM) and no plastic film mulching (NM)] and three urea types [conventional urea (U), controlled-release urea (C), and a mixture of equal amounts of conventional urea and controlled-release urea at a ratio of 1:1 (CU)] and their interactions. The results showed that RM significantly decreased cumulative N2O emissions and CH4 uptake by 4.9% and 28.4%, but significantly increased NGWP by 8.9% relative to NM. Compared with U, the C and CU produced much lower cumulative N2O emissions and NGWP and higher CH4 uptake. The interaction of mulching methods and urea type had significant influence on tuber yield and NEEB. Considering both environment and production, RMCU could not only achieve a high tuber yield and NEEB (by up to 26.5% and 42.9%, respectively), but also reduce the CF (by up to 13.7%), and therefore should be considered an effective strategy for dryland potato.