Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 1(75), p. e1137-e1144, 2022

DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab1053

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Sexually Transmitted Infection Transmission Dynamics During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Among Urban Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mitigation measures on sexually transmitted infection (STI) transmission and racial disparities remains unknown. Our objectives were to compare sex and drug risk behaviors, access to sexual health services, and STI positivity overall and by race during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with pre-pandemic among urban sexual minority men (MSM). Methods Sexually active MSM aged 18–45 years were administered a behavioral survey and STI testing every 3-months. Participants who completed at least 1 during-pandemic (April 2020–December 2020) and 1 pre-pandemic study visit (before 13 March 2020) that occurred less than 6 months apart were included. Regression models were used to compare during- and pre-pandemic visit outcomes. Results Overall, among 231 MSM, reports of more than 3 sex partners declined(pandemic-1: adjusted prevalence ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval: .54–.86; pandemic-2: 0.65, .51–.84; pandemic-3: 0.57, .43–.75), substance use decreased (pandemic-1: 0.75, .61–.75; pandemic-2: 0.62, .50–.78; pandemic-3: 0.61, .47–.80), and human immunodeficiency virus/preexposure prophylaxis care engagement (pandemic-1: 1.20, 1.07–1.34; pandemic-2: 1.24, 1.11–1.39; pandemic-3: 1.30, 1.16–1.47) increased. STI testing decreased (pandemic-1: 0.68, .57–.81; pandemic-2: 0.78, .67–.92), then rebounded (pandemic-3: 1.01, .87–1.18). Nei­ther Chlamydia (pandemic-2: 1.62, .75–3.46; pandemic-3: 1.13, .24–1.27) nor gonorrhea (pandemic-2: 0.87, .46 1.62; pandemic-3: 0.56, .24–1.27) positivity significantly changed during vs pre-pandemic. Trends were mostly similar among Black vs. non-Black MSM. Conclusions We observed sustained decreases in STI risk behaviors but minimal change in STI positivity during compared with pre-pandemic. Our findings underscore the need for novel STI prevention strategies that can be delivered without in-person interactions.