Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

MDPI, Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 8(9), p. 278, 2022

DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9080278

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Very High-Power Short-Duration (HPSD) Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Short and Long-Term Outcome Data

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard of care intervention for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). During follow-up, a substantial number of patients need a redo procedure due to reconnections on the basis of insufficient non-transmural ablation lesions. High-power short-duration ablation (HPSD) is expected to create efficient lesions while causing fewer complications than in conventional RFA settings. The aim of this study was to compare one-year outcome data of very HPSD (90 Watt, 4 s) to a strategy using 50 Watt HPSD ablation guided by the CLOSE protocol using the Ablation Index (AI), an arbitrary unit composed of power, contact force and ablation time. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed short and long-term (median follow-up 23.2 ± 9.9 months) outcome data from 52 patients that were scheduled for first-do-symptomatic PVI. A very HPSD ablation protocol with 90 Watt and a 4 s duration cut-off was compared to an HPSD CLOSE approach (50 Watts; AI 550 at the anterior LA wall; AI 400 at the posterior LA wall, the roof and the floor) in terms of freedom from AF recurrence in a long-term electrocardiogram (ECG) over a five days surveillance period. To gain an impression of the subjective sense of wellbeing, the Atrial Fibrillation Effects on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) score was recorded. Results: Overall freedom from AF was found in 81% (90 W 4 s) vs. 87.5% (50 W), (p = 0.52). There were 3 AF recurrences during the blanking period (90 W 4 s) vs. 1 (50 W). Within each population, one patient was scheduled for a redo-PVI-procedure. The AFEQT score was in favor of the 90 Watt 4 s approach (86.1 vs. 77.5; p = 0.37). Conclusion: Within our relatively small studied population, we found hints that in addition to shortening ablation times and radiation exposure without significantly increasing the rate of relevant intraprocedural complications, very high power short-duration ablation (90 W 4 s) provides comparable efficacy rates after one year.