Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 5(77), p. 1424-1431, 2022

DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac039

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Influence of tedizolid on the cytokine response to the endotoxin challenge in healthy volunteers: a cross-over trial

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background Preclinical data suggested anti-inflammatory properties of tedizolid. Objectives To investigate the influence of tedizolid on the cytokine response to the human endotoxin challenge and the effect of endotoxaemia on the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of tedizolid. Methods In this cross-over trial, 14 male healthy volunteers underwent two treatment periods: (A) 200 mg of tedizolid phosphate once daily for 6 days (3 days orally and 3 days intravenously), followed by an intravenous bolus of 2 ng/kg body weight of LPS on the last treatment day; and (B) intravenous bolus of LPS (2 ng/kg body weight) without concomitant tedizolid treatment. Participants underwent first period A or B, separated by at least 6 weeks. Plasma was sampled to assess cytokines and the pharmacokinetics of tedizolid. Results Following the endotoxin challenge, the peak plasma concentration (median [IQR]; 280 [155–502] versus 287 [132–541] pg/mL; P = 0.875) and AUC0–24 (979 [676–1319] versus 1000 [647–1632] pg·h/mL; P = 0.638) of interleukin-6 remained unchanged with and without concomitant tedizolid treatment. The peak concentration and AUC0–24 of TNF-α remained also unchanged with and without tedizolid (47 [31–61] versus 54 [27–69] pg/mL; P = 0.73 and 197 [163–268] versus 234 [146–280] pg·h/mL; P = 0.875, respectively). The total maximum concentration (mean ± SD; 2.94 ± 0.69 versus 2.96 ± 0.62 mg/L), total AUC0–24 (22.3 ± 3.8 versus 21.1 ± 3.6 mg·h/L) and protein binding (21.4% ± 1.7% versus 21.6% ± 1.9%) of tedizolid were similar with and without the endotoxin challenge. Conclusions Tedizolid did not attenuate the LPS-induced cytokine response in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, endotoxaemia did not influence the plasma pharmacokinetics of tedizolid.