Published in

Elsevier BV, 2022

DOI: 10.17863/cam.79777

Elsevier, European Neuropsychopharmacology, (54), p. 21-40, 2022

DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.10.004

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the general population (COMET-G) study

Journal article published in 2022 by Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis ORCID, Grigorios Karakatsoulis ORCID, Seri Abraham ORCID, Kristina Adorjan, Helal Uddin Ahmed ORCID, Renato D. Alarcón, Kiyomi Arai, Sani Salihu Auwal, Michael Berk ORCID, Sarah Bjedov, Julio Bobes ORCID, Maria Teresa Bobes-Bascaran ORCID, Julie Bourgin-Duchesnay, Cristina Ana Bredicean, Laurynas Bukelskis and other authors.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There are few published empirical data on the effects of COVID-19 on mental health, and until now, there is no large international study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, an online questionnaire gathered data from 55,589 participants from 40 countries (64.85% females aged 35.80 ± 13.61; 34.05% males aged 34.90±13.29 and 1.10% other aged 31.64±13.15). Distress and probable depression were identified with the use of a previously developed cut-off and algorithm respectively. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were calculated. Chi-square tests, multiple forward stepwise linear regression analyses and Factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tested relations among variables. RESULTS: Probable depression was detected in 17.80% and distress in 16.71%. A significant percentage reported a deterioration in mental state, family dynamics and everyday lifestyle. Persons with a history of mental disorders had higher rates of current depression (31.82% vs. 13.07%). At least half of participants were accepting (at least to a moderate degree) a non-bizarre conspiracy. The highest Relative Risk (RR) to develop depression was associated with history of Bipolar disorder and self-harm/attempts (RR = 5.88). Suicidality was not increased in persons without a history of any mental disorder. Based on these results a model was developed. CONCLUSIONS: The final model revealed multiple vulnerabilities and an interplay leading from simple anxiety to probable depression and suicidality through distress. This could be of practical utility since many of these factors are modifiable. Future research and interventions should specifically focus on them.