Published in

Karger Publishers, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 2(51), p. 182-192, 2022

DOI: 10.1159/000524390

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Alzheimer’s Disease Plasma Biomarkers Distinguish Clinical Diagnostic Groups in Memory Clinic Patients

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Several recent research studies show high performance of blood biomarkers to identify Alzheimer’s disease also in the pre-dementia mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage, but data from the routine clinical care memory clinic setting are needed. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We examined plasma samples of 144 memory clinic patients, including dementia of Alzheimer type (DAT, <i>n</i> = 54), MCI (<i>n</i> = 57), and subjective cognitive decline (SCD, <i>n</i> = 33), who either presented as self-referrals or were referred by general practitioners or neurologists or psychiatrists. The plasma biomarkers, amyloid-beta42 (Aß42), amyloid-beta40 (Aß40), phospho-Tau181 (pTau181), total-tau (tTau), and neurofilament light (NFL), as well as different ratios, were measured using the ultrasensitive single molecule array (Simoa) immunoassay technology. Statistical analysis including Kruskal-Wallis test, linear regression, and receiver operating characteristics analyses was performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the single markers, we observed statistically significant group effects of pTau181 (H(2) = 34.43, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and NFL (H(2) = 27.66, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). All individual group comparisons of pTau181 were significant, while the contrast of SCD versus MCI for NFL was not significant. In addition, the ratios of Aß42/Aß40 (H(2) = 7.50, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and pTau181/Aß42 (H(2) = 25.26, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) showed significant group effects with significant difference between all groups for pTau181/Aß42 and an SCD versus MCI difference for Aß42/Aß40. PTau181 showed the highest area under the curve of 0.85 for the discrimination of SCD and DAT with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 79% at a cut-off of 12.2 pg/mL. Age influenced Aß42, Aß40, and NFL concentrations. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Plasma pTau181 and NFL, as well as the ratios Aß42/Aß40 and pTau181/Aß42, are biomarkers, which can differentiate diagnostic groups in a memory clinic setting outside of research studies.