Published in

American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, p. 1-6, 2022

DOI: 10.3171/2022.3.peds2267



Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Characteristics of concussion subtypes from a multidomain assessment

Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher
Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO


OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to analyze the best combination of clinical variables associated with concussion subtypes using a multidomain assessment comprising medical history; symptoms; and cognitive, ocular, and vestibular impairment in a cohort of patients presenting to a concussion specialty clinic. METHODS Adolescent patients (n = 293) completed demographics and medical history, Concussion Clinical Profiles Screening, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing, and vestibular ocular motor screening at their first visit (mean 7.6 ± 7.8 days postinjury) to a concussion specialty clinic. Each participant was adjudicated to have one or more subtype (anxiety/mood, cognitive, migraine, ocular, and vestibular) by a healthcare professional based on previously published criteria. A series of backward, stepwise logistic regressions were used to identify significant predictors of concussion subtypes, and predictive probabilities from the logistic regression models were entered into area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) models. RESULTS Each of 5 logistic regression models predicting primary subtypes accounted for 28%–50% of the variance (R2 = 0.28–0.50, p < 0.001) and included 2–8 significant predictors per model. Each of the models significantly differentiated the primary subtype from all other subtypes (AUC = 0.76–0.94, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that each concussion subtype can be identified using specific outcomes from a multidomain assessment. Clinicians can employ such an approach to better identify and monitor recovery from subtypes as well as guide interventions.