Published in

Nature Research, Nature Genetics, 1(53), p. 86-99, 2021

DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-00750-6

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Conservation of copy number profiles during engraftment and passaging of patient-derived cancer xenografts

Journal article published in 2019 by M. van de Ven, Petra ter Brugge, Xing Yi Woo, Roebi de Bruijn, Anuj Srivastava, Zi-Ming Zhao, Michael W. Lloyd, Yun-Suhk Suh, J.-I. Kim, Vito W. Rebecca, Rajesh Patidar, Sandra Scherer, S. Li, Chieh-Hsiang Yang, P. N. Robinson and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractPatient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are resected human tumors engrafted into mice for preclinical studies and therapeutic testing. It has been proposed that the mouse host affects tumor evolution during PDX engraftment and propagation, affecting the accuracy of PDX modeling of human cancer. Here, we exhaustively analyze copy number alterations (CNAs) in 1,451 PDX and matched patient tumor (PT) samples from 509 PDX models. CNA inferences based on DNA sequencing and microarray data displayed substantially higher resolution and dynamic range than gene expression-based inferences, and they also showed strong CNA conservation from PTs through late-passage PDXs. CNA recurrence analysis of 130 colorectal and breast PT/PDX-early/PDX-late trios confirmed high-resolution CNA retention. We observed no significant enrichment of cancer-related genes in PDX-specific CNAs across models. Moreover, CNA differences between patient and PDX tumors were comparable to variations in multiregion samples within patients. Our study demonstrates the lack of systematic copy number evolution driven by the PDX mouse host.