Published in

Oxford University Press, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2019

DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz439

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Physicians' opinions on generic antiretroviral drugs and single-tablet regimen de-simplification for the treatment of HIV infection: a multicentre survey in Spain.

Journal article published in 2020 by M. Ángeles Muñoz Fernández, Ignacio de los Santos, María del Mar Alonso, Miguel Ángel von Wichmann, Juan Carlos López Bernaldo de Quirós, Jose Ignacio Bernardino de la Serna, Santos del Campo Terrón, Maria del CarmenVillalba, Adolfo de Salazar Gonzalez, Alfonso del Arco, Josefina López de Munain, Mireia de la Peña, Miguel Alberto de Zarraga, Beatriz Álvarez, Josefa Muñoz Sánchez and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo assess the attitudes and opinions about generic antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) and single-tablet regimen (STR) de-simplification among physicians prescribing HIV treatment in the cohort of the Spanish HIV/AIDS Research Network (CoRIS).MethodsAn online questionnaire with 27 structured questions was sent to all physicians (n = 199) who prescribed ARVs among the 45 centres participating in the cohort.ResultsA total of 169 (84.9%) physicians answered the questionnaire. Only 4.1% of the physicians would never prescribe generic ARVs, but 53.3% would not prescribe them if the number of pills per day increased and 89.3% would not prescribe them if the number of doses per day increased. However, 84.0% of the physicians agreed to prescribe generic ARVs if doing so would decrease costs for the public healthcare system. The percentages of physicians stating that generic ARVs (compared with branded ones) would be associated with worse adherence, more adverse effects or more probability of virological failure, provided that the number of pills and doses per day would not change, were low: 0.6%, 7.7% and 3.6%, respectively. However, these percentages were much higher if the generic ARV entailed breaking an STR: 63.9%, 18.9% and 42.0%, respectively. Most physicians stated that they needed more information about the effectiveness and safety of generic ARVs and the price difference compared with their branded equivalents.ConclusionsAlthough most physicians were confident about prescribing generic ARVs, the majority had strong concerns about de-simplifying STR, and they also needed more information about generic drugs.