Published in

American Association for Cancer Research, Clinical Cancer Research, 5(28), p. 870-881, 2021

DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1295

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Results from a First-in-Human Phase I Study of Siremadlin (HDM201) in Patients with Advanced Wild-Type TP53 Solid Tumors and Acute Leukemia

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: This phase I, dose-escalation study investigated the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of siremadlin, a p53–MDM2 inhibitor, in patients with wild-type TP53 advanced solid or hematologic cancers. Patients and Methods: Initial dosing regimens were: 1A (day 1; 21-day cycle; dose 12.5–350 mg) and 2A (days 1–14; 28-day cycle; dose 1–20 mg). Alternative regimens included 1B (days 1 and 8; 28-day cycle) and 2C (days 1–7; 28-day cycle). The primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during cycle 1. Results: Overall, 115 patients with solid tumors and 93 with hematologic malignancies received treatment. DLTs occurred in 8/92 patients with solid tumors and 10/53 patients with hematologic malignancies. In solid tumors, an RDE of 120 mg was defined in 1B. In hematologic tumors, RDEs were defined in 1A: 250 mg, 1B: 120 mg, and 2C: 45 mg. More patients with hematologic malignancies compared with solid tumors experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (71% vs. 45%), most commonly resulting from myelosuppression. These were more frequent and severe in patients with hematologic malignancies; 22 patients exhibited tumor lysis syndrome. Overall response rates at the RDEs were 10.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.2–27.4] in solid tumors and 4.2% (95% CI, 0.1–21.1), 20% (95% CI, 4.3–48.1), and 22.2% (95% CI, 8.6–42.3) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 1B, 1A, and 2C, respectively. Conclusions: A common safety profile was identified and preliminary activity was noted, particularly in AML. Comprehensive investigation of dosing regimens yielded recommended doses/regimens for future combination studies.